Theology Paper

The article posits that philosophers define atheism as being the belief in a being who is perfect, who has attributes such as all powerful, immutable, all knowing, perfectly simple, perfectly good and necessarily existent. The article additionally posits that the view normally has two major shortcomings in relation to the view of God. The initial claim posits that it is impossible to make all the assertions about God coherent. The example follows that it is unlikely for God can both be perfectly perfect good as well as powerful in a world which is full of occurrences of terrible injustices. In addition, it posits that it difficult to fathom the fact that God can possess the infinite power to initiate change as well as an alteration in all things on the occasion that he is immutable.

The second claim by the article in reference to the theist view of God as being what the Bible describes Him. It follows that it is difficult to locate the evidence by the prophets as well as the scholars who wrote the Old Testament. In the Old Testament, God is not viewed as being immutable but changes his mind constantly about things such as his regrets in the context of creating the human being. He is not the al knowing God as he is constantly surprised by things as the Israelites choosing a cow statue over him. Additionally the article posits that he is not all powerful since he is unable to regulate the Israelites and get them to do as he wants. The article posits that philosophers over a long period of time have been trying to make God’s supposed perfections into fitting together in a coherent version and consequently fit with the Bible. The major assertion by the atheist is that the doctrines are asserting that God is perfect normally fails to make any sense and the idea that God is a being fails to resemble the God of the Bible.

Analysis

The position of the article is on whether it is necessary to conclude that God is a perfect being or rather whether he is perfect at all? The fact that all the available literature about God tends to maximize all of his maximum constituent principles at the same time gives rise to the availability of contradictions. The absurdities as well as the contradiction that are emerging are the ones that the atheists are using in their attack on Christianity.

The other factor that results in the challenging the assertion that God is all perfect encompasses the fact that all biblical accounts about God emphasize that human beings have a partial and fragmented encounter. The assertion is supported by the fact that Moses, who is regarded as the greatest prophet, could not be allowed to see the face of God, but only a glimpse of his back. Thus, the assertion by the atheist posits that the reason as to why humans could not be allowed to view God directly is because they may have realized and started questioning the imperfections. Thus, they use the Hebrew context which is in reference to God being "I will be what I will be" implying that God is imperfect and that he is changing as well as incomplete. The fact that God shifts from the seeming indifference as well as back, altering the demands to the human beings who stood before him coupled with his responses which were at times devastating. The elements are normally not in reference to the perfections of God that the human beings normally know.

Carolyn Morgan is the author of this paper. A senior editor at Melda Research in 24 hour custom essay. if you need a similar paper you can place your order for a custom research paper from already written essay.