What are the characteristics of abstract or non-objective art?

Author: John Ophelia

Abstract art or non-objective art is a genre that defies the conventional representations of the visual world, choosing instead to focus on the use of color, form, and composition to convey emotion, ideas, and aesthetics. It emerged as a significant movement in the early 20th century, largely as a reaction to the constraints and conventions of representational art. Non-objective art, unlike abstract art that may still loosely reference real-world forms, completely rejects the depiction of recognizable subjects. Instead, it emphasizes the purity of visual elements—lines, shapes, colors, and textures—which are used to evoke responses from the viewer through their intrinsic properties rather than through association with the external world. The key characteristics of abstract art or non-objective art lie in its radical departure from tradition, its focus on emotional expression, and its emphasis on the formal elements of art.

At its core, abstract or non-objective art liberates the artist from the need to depict the natural world realistically. This move towards abstraction can be traced back to movements such as Cubism, Futurism, and Expressionism, which paved the way for a more radical departure from the depiction of recognizable objects. Artists like Wassily Kandinsky, Piet Mondrian, Kazimir Malevich, and Jackson Pollock played pivotal roles in this transformation, each experimenting with new ways to represent human experience and perception without relying on literal subject matter. Kandinsky, often regarded as one of the pioneers of abstract art, was particularly interested in how art could communicate the spiritual and emotional states of the artist. His use of bold colors and shapes was intended not to represent objects but to tap into a deeper, more universal emotional resonance. Malevich’s "Black Square" is often seen as a radical gesture, rejecting any form of visual representation in favor of pure abstraction, signaling a move toward an art form that emphasized the significance of form and color in their own right.

One of the defining characteristics of abstract art or non-objective art is its focus on formal elements such as color, shape, line, texture, and space. In abstract art, these elements are treated as independent entities that do not need to represent or symbolize anything outside of themselves. For instance, the use of color is no longer tied to its role in depicting objects but becomes a powerful tool for creating mood, evoking emotions, or creating harmony or dissonance within a composition. Mondrian’s work, with its geometric forms and primary colors, embodies this focus on form and color for their own sake. The color red, blue, and yellow in his compositions do not represent anything except the fundamental visual components of the artwork. Similarly, the way in which lines are used in non-objective art often serves to direct the viewer’s attention, create rhythm, or establish structure within the artwork, without needing to depict an external subject. In works like Pollock’s drip paintings, the lines are created through the physical act of painting itself, blurring the boundary between art and the process of its creation.

Another characteristic of abstract art or non-objective art is its emphasis on emotional expression. Rather than focusing on realistic representations or narrative content, abstract artists seek to communicate their inner emotions, psychological states, or philosophical ideas through their compositions. The abstraction of form allows artists to go beyond the literal and tap into a more profound and universal language of feeling. Pollock’s "drip paintings" are an excellent example of this. His works, often characterized by dynamic splashes of paint, are not intended to represent specific subjects but instead reflect the artist’s emotions, physical gestures, and engagement with the canvas. The chaotic, energetic patterns in these paintings can convey a sense of turmoil, freedom, or catharsis, engaging the viewer on a visceral, emotional level. In the same vein, Rothko’s large color field paintings evoke a sense of introspection and spiritual depth, with their soft, luminous blocks of color inviting contemplation and emotional engagement.

The lack of a specific subject matter also enables abstract or non-objective art to engage viewers in a more personal and open-ended way. Because the works do not rely on familiar imagery or symbolism, viewers are free to interpret them based on their own experiences, emotions, and associations. This interaction between the viewer and the artwork becomes a more active and subjective process, where the meaning of the piece is not fixed but emerges through personal engagement. This is part of the reason why abstract art often elicits such diverse reactions from viewers; each person brings their own perspective and emotional response to the work, making the experience of viewing abstract art deeply individual. The emphasis on subjective experience, both for the artist and the viewer, is a core element of non-objective art.

Despite the emphasis on emotion and formal elements, abstract or non-objective art does not completely disregard the principles of composition. In fact, many abstract artists were deeply concerned with achieving balance, harmony, and unity within their compositions. Mondrian’s grid-based works, for example, showcase an extreme precision and attention to the arrangement of elements. The careful placement of lines and blocks of color creates a rhythm and order that is a departure from the chaotic nature of some other abstract works but still exists within the realm of abstraction. Similarly, other artists like Kandinsky or the members of the De Stijl movement in the Netherlands sought to establish order through geometric abstraction, focusing on precise proportions and harmonious relationships between shapes and colors. This balance between freedom of expression and formal composition is one of the hallmarks of abstract or non-objective art.

The rejection of objective representation also extends to the materials and techniques used in non-objective art. The way in which artists use their tools—the brush, palette knife, or even their own hands—becomes an integral part of the artwork itself. Pollock’s use of spontaneous dripping and splattering paint directly onto the canvas, for example, transforms the act of creation into an essential element of the artwork. The physicality of the process and the textures created by these methods are just as important as the final image. This emphasis on process rather than product is also seen in the development of other experimental techniques, such as the use of non-traditional materials or unconventional methods of mark-making. The artwork is no longer just about a finished product; it is about the relationship between the artist, the materials, and the act of creation itself.

Furthermore, abstract or non-objective art is often seen as a reflection of the modern era, responding to the rapid technological advancements, scientific discoveries, and social changes of the time. The rise of abstraction coincided with significant shifts in philosophy, psychology, and cultural thought. The increasing interest in the subconscious, as seen in Surrealism, and the breakdown of traditional social structures prompted artists to explore new forms of expression that went beyond the confines of realism. Non-objective art’s rejection of external references can be viewed as a response to a world that was becoming more complex and fragmented. In this sense, abstract art can be seen not only as an aesthetic choice but also as a philosophical statement, an attempt to articulate the artist’s relationship to a rapidly changing world.

Finally, one of the most significant characteristics of abstract art or non-objective art is its ability to challenge viewers' expectations and assumptions about what art can be. By stripping away recognizable imagery, abstract art forces the viewer to reconsider the role of art in society and the ways in which it can communicate meaning. It demands a different kind of engagement with the artwork, one that is less about interpretation and more about the direct experience of the visual and emotional elements. The viewer is invited to engage with the artwork on a more primal level, responding to the colors, shapes, and lines as sensory stimuli rather than as representations of the external world.

In conclusion, abstract art or non-objective art is characterized by its radical departure from representation, focusing on formal elements like color, shape, and line to communicate emotion, ideas, and aesthetics. It emphasizes the subjective experience of both the artist and the viewer, offering a new, more personal relationship with art. By eliminating recognizable subject matter, abstract artists create works that challenge the viewer to engage with art in a more direct, visceral way. Through its exploration of emotion, process, and composition, non-objective art reflects both the artist’s inner world and the complexities of the modern era. Its enduring appeal lies in its ability to evoke powerful responses and open up new possibilities for artistic expression.