Top 5 Reasons for Manuscript Rejections and How Publication Support ServicesCan Help You Get Publish

It is a widely known fact that academic publishing is a rigorous process. For many researchers, especially first timers, the publishing process can be a daunting task. Non-adherence to journal guidelines and publishing protocols result in outright rejections. Hence, the crude reality of academic publishing is that there are more manuscript rejections than acceptances, let alone successful publications.According to a recent finding, American Psychological Association’s top journals averaged a rejection rate of about 76 percent, and Nature Materials reported a rejection rate of about 87 percent. Research suggests that most of the high-impact factor journals have rejection rates of 90% and only open-access journals tend to have lower rejection rates

Below are the top 5 reasons for manuscript rejections:

Incorrect/Incomplete submission formalities:Submitting to a journal involves stringent formalities and exhaustive paper-work that needs to be adhered to. Authors, especially first timers, and English as second language writers often make errors while filling the submission formalities. Hence, non-adherence to submission formalities can be the first reason for rejection even before it reaches the review process.

Incorrect journal selection: Authors often select journals which are highly-indexed without considering the most important factors like, scope of study, target journal type, and significance of article in its field of specialty. This is one of the major reasons for outright rejections of manuscripts in the initial stage of the publication process.

Formatting and Proofreading errors: Some authors submit manuscripts that are not in line with the journal guidelines. There manuscript contains frequent typos, grammatical errors and poor punctuation. Such errors imply that the author hasn’t taken the necessary care to produce a foolproof manuscript and hence this is one of the prime reasons for manuscript rejection.

Plagiarism: Another reason for rejections is that the manuscript contains elements that are suspected to be plagiarized. Republishing articles or parts of articles, using text or images without permission is one of the major reasons for manuscript rejection.

Poor writing: Last but not the least, poor writing has been the top reason for manuscript rejections.Stilted, flowery, or grammatically incorrect writing is a complete turn-off for journal editors. Top international journals like Elsevier, Springer, PLOS, etc., give preference to a manuscript which contains consistent sentence structure and flawless English language.

In a nutshell, publishing research is a long and complicated process. Multiple factors contribute to the acceptance and publication of a manuscript by the target journal after submission. It is difficult for a researcher to comprehend all the factors while adhering to the journal guidelines and not losing focus from their research. Especially, if it is a first time researcher, he is bound to be intimidated by the entire publication process and have a bitter experience of the publication journey.

This is where Language Editing Services like Enago and Publication Support Services can help you bridge the gap between manuscript preparation and publication. They offer a one-stop solution for researchers to make their entire publishing journey seamless and stress-free. From selecting an appropriate journal for a manuscript, to its editing and formatting according to target journal guidelines, and even submitting the manuscript on the author’s behalf,their services are designed to offer authors with comprehensive assistance at each stage of their journey to achieve publication success.

There is something very odd about this rejection system on different sides of a tectonic shift in the academic research landscape. The same sort of upheaval has been knocking the global research community due to reasons that still persist after repeated trials. Professional publication support services aims to capitalize on its expertise of talent pool to help research scholars eschew major rejection objects. The art of the company is keenly attuned to the very stern standards of leading publication hubs.

Robert Smith works as a content expert with