- Views: 27
- Report Article
- Articles
- Reference & Education
- College & University
Introduction to Psychology
Posted: Nov 14, 2018
In the case of agreeableness, the results indicate that I am average in that although I am concerned with the needs of others, I am not willing to sacrifice myself for to meet the needs of others. The case applies that those who have high agreeableness scores will always put the needs of others before their own irrespective of the situation. Conversely, those with a low agreeableness score apply to those individuals who would not take into considerations the needs of other people in on their own irrespective of the situation. Being average implies that issues as morality and altruism are not highly regarded while trust is an issue that is underdeveloped. The individual has to be totally sure of the most probable outcome before they engage in the agreeable situation and will not jump into a situation because morality demands that one does. Taking account of the situation is thus principle to these individuals while issues as sympathy, modesty and cooperating with others are valued. The sympathy that an individual has regarding the welfare of others is thus the main attribute that is going to guide the trend with which to take concern for the welfare of others around us.
The conscientiousness results are average, an indication that I am self-controlled, reasonably reliable as well as organized. There are different elements that are applicable in making addressing an individual’s Conscientiousness such as self-efficacy, dutifulness, dutifulness, and self-disciplined among others. People balance these items differently, and the comprehension of that fact is vital in assessing the outcome of the tests. The individuals with Conscientiousness will imply that the individual has set high scores that they do a lot in trying to accomplish in addition to having a high level of determination. Those with the low Conscientiousness score, on the other hand, are individuals who only live for the moment and do only that which pleases them in addition to the fact that they are disorganized and careless. The ultimate score of an individual will be dependent on their ability to strike a balance in these attributes although most individuals are good in some while not so good in others.
The neuroticism score is indicative of the fact that my level of emotional reactivity is standard to the population and that although stressful events are upsetting; there is the ability to cope with the events. The ability to balance the different elements that guide the levels of neuroticism as anxiety, anger, immoderation, depressions as well as self-consciousness are vital in understanding an individual’s levels of neuroticism. What the individuals low on neuroticism is composed, exceptionally calm and barely flat table. They do not react to intense emotions as well as those events that other people would describe as stressful. The counterparts who are high on neuroticism, however, are easily upset even by the events people would consider normal. The comprehension of an individual’s neuroticism is thus dependent on how they can balance the reaction to the different elements making up neuroticism.
The openness to experience score is average, implying that although there is a preference for the tradition, new experiences are much welcome. To understand how individuals react about the openness attributes, it is best to understand their assessment of the different elements as imagination, emotionality, intellect as well as adventurousness among others. Through these attributes, an individual will have a low or high score of their experience to the different experiences.
Sherry Roberts is the author of this paper. A senior editor at Melda Research in custom college essay services if you need a similar paper you can place your order for a custom research paper from legitimate paper writing services.
"Janet Peter is the Managing Director of a globally competitive essay writing company.