The Balance between Personal Privacy and National Security

In the war against terrorism, what’s the trade-off Americans are confronting between security and privacy? (Explain in detail!)

The war against terrorism has created a lot of privacy and security concerns among the Americans. This is based on the fact that National Security Agency surveillance programs go beyond the civil liberties of the Americans. The anti-terror programs go too far in restricting civil liberties which are provided for in the fourth amendment of the US constitution. The war against terror infringes the rights of privacy by entering into people’s private information as well as their businesses data. Base on the fact those digital technologies capture a wide array of data about them; anti-terror surveillance can make people vulnerable to digital age crimes. Therefore, anti-terrorism laws infringe on American civil liberties.

Illustrate the legal issues or consequences may affect American people while the government was collecting (or spying) your personal information (i.e., privacy) in the name of national security.

When the government collects personal information in the name of national security, their information can unearth other criminal informational bout people. As a result, the government can use it against them. At the same, time, collecting personal information of people can become a privacy risk to the people. This can prompt lawsuits against the government of marking people vulnerable to digital crimes. Therefore, people may be forced to seek legal protection against the infringement of their civil liberties by the government

Discuss legal rules and regulations on the scope and limitation that the government can or cannot collect personal information without the due process of law (e.g., the search warrant).

There are some regulations that govern the extent to which the government can spy into citizen’s personal information. In the US for instance, spying must involve the government agency filing a warrant with the Intelligence Surveillance Court. This is to ensure that the program is lawful. Similarly, search warrants must be legal and constitutional. This means that under the civil rights, no personal is supposed to be searched without a warrant. At the same time, there are limitations in that the government agencies are allowed to c search without warrants. This involves situations that present probable identification of particular crimes. If a person is perceived a threat and is perceived to have links to crime, the government agencies can search him without warrants.

Discuss the ethical issues associated with the government collecting personal information among American people in the name of national security.

Despite the fact that the government has the responsibility of ensuring security for its people, collecting personal information of citizen in the name of national security presents ethical issues. For instance, some surveillance personnel from national security agencies can leak personal information of people to criminals. Such information can include credit card numbers and other banking information. Security agents can sell this information for their financial gains. Secondly, collecting personal information can make people to be criminalized anyhow. The national security agencies can also start to engage in witch-handing people for crimes that do not threaten national security. Therefore, collecting personal information infringes on privacy and can make people’s personal information to be vulnerable to crimes.

Your personal feedbacks on the balance of personal privacy and national security while combating terrorism against the United States and American people.

Personally, I must concur with the fact that the government has to fulfill its mandate of ensuring security its citizens. Carrying out this role must always demand to infringe on the personal privacy of citizens. To strike a balance between national security and people’s privacy, surveillance agencies must stick on legalities of searches into personal information. Where there is need of not following due process, there must be enough evidence that a person is engaging in activities that threaten national security. In sum combating terrorism must uphold civil liberties that are guaranteed by the constitution.

Sherry Roberts is the author of this paper. A senior editor at Melda Research in research paper company if you need a similar paper you can place your order for a custom research paper from nursing papers for sale.

"Janet Peter is the Managing Director of a globally competitive essay writing company.