Worldly Views

Corporate Social Responsibility

Corporate social responsibility demands that any organization should work in a manner that facilitates the development of the society and its residents. The chapter argues that only social responsibility the management of a business has is to create shareholder wealth legally and with integrity. Every business has to find a way of balancing between social, economic, and legal responsibilities. Businesses should deploy corporate social responsibility as a means for better and sustainable processes (Lawrence, 2013). According to the chapter arguments against the incorporation of corporate social responsibilities into business operations of the business indicate that corporate executives are responsible only to shareholders (Lawrence, 2013). The management of a business should work towards increasing the value of the business for the shareholders. Furthermore, the business incurs numerous expenses while executing social responsibilities. The argument continues to indicate that corporate social responsibility cannot create a significant change in the world (Lawrence, 2013). Arguments supporting embracing of corporate social responsibility indicate that corporate social responsibility is a way for the business to give back to the society among many other factors. Additionally, businesses accrue several benefits from embracing corporate social responsibility (Lawrence, 2013). The chapter argues that corporate social responsibility has the potential of customer and employee engagement as well as brand differentiation.

I concur with the argument supporting embracing of corporate social responsibility even though execution of corporate social responsibility poses a risk to the business. First of all business is all about taking risks; therefore, businesses should not worry about the little implications of embracing corporate social responsibility. Rather the corporations should find ways of achieving strategic goals and at the same time executing corporate social responsibility. Numerous people will argue that the primary objective of the management of a business is to create value for the shareholders of the business. A larger share of these individuals argues that businesses will incur unnecessary costs through execution of corporate social responsibility. Nonetheless, there is a diversity of business operations that the management should orchestrate and execute to build the value of a business. More importantly, corporate social responsibility is a way of creating sustainability.

If businesses are afraid to execute corporate social responsibility out of good will, then they should consider the fact that it can benefit the company. There are numerous reasons for the execution of corporate social responsibility. Not only can the businesses use corporate social responsibility to boost their public relations but also create better customer relations. Every business that desires to succeed should have good public relations. Moreover, the public relations of a company and the customer relations of a business intertwine. Businesses can use corporate social responsibility as a marketing tool to increase their sales and create a competitive advantage over other companies. The business will participate in activities that boost the brand name of the business and in the process increase the customer acquisition and retention rates. In turn, the business will increase the sales subsequently achieving the value of the business. The act of corporate social responsibility allows the business also to engage with the employees increasing their job satisfaction levels and in the process motivating them to perform more. Every stakeholder in the organization has a crucial role to play in delivering its strategic goals. Furthermore, embracing corporate social responsibility creates a healthy atmosphere for business operations and transactions.

The Maya Diaspora

Leon and Alvis (2000) create some sense of human struggle in the age of globalization. The authors ground their theoretical framing by studying Guatemalan immigrants in a small U.S. Midwestern town and their efforts to catch up to the global society. The authors conclude that individuals in U.S. labor markets get used to aspects of power dynamics, and radicalization around jobs. The chapter creates an image of the hardships created by the globalization of firms by using the migration and settlement of Guatemalan-born workers in a Morganton, North Carolina. The chapter provides an explanation of how people came to a consensus and created legal structures to protect them from the employers. It shows the efforts made to settle down in a more global society.

Carey & Torres (2010) epitomizes a documented description of gender-based violence. It focuses on the act of femicide as observed in Guatemala. The study reviews the demographics of the number of female murders in the country. According to the study, the rate of female murders as a result of malicious attacks has increased and is similar to the civil war period in Guatemala. These acts indicate the citizens in the region have normalized the act of gender-based violence. The article also provides a description of how the government is dealing with this issue. More importantly the article provides the effects of the inaction observed.

The methodology used by Leon & Alvis (2000) describes that process and the results of migration from the story of Guatemala migrants. The chapter provides the first comparative view of the formation and transformation of this new and expanding the transnational population, presented from the standpoint of the migrants themselves. It creates a theory of the difficulties created by globalization from a societal and international perspective. In sum, the chapter furnishes distinct and ethnographically grounded perspectives on the dynamic implications of globalization. The chapter creates a sense of the idea using the stories of the Maya’s quiet courage and also as a representative of many other minority groups across the globe. On the other hand, Carey & Torres (2010) use the demographic comparison of the events that occurred in Guatemala. The study uses the rate of femicide cases reported in Guatemala decades ago to those orchestrated recently to create an understanding of the current situation. The technique used in Carey & Torres (2010) lists case types by probably variable assortment to assist with selection of predictors to the domestic violence in Guatemala.

Leon and Alvis (2000) argues that the best way to understand the experiences of the minority population in the United States is by deploying a framework that studies global economic and political forces. These forces must be predictors solicit Latin America’s global reserve army of labor to meet and transcend the U.S. national labor. Carey & Torres (2010) argues that against the Maya should get viewed as a homogenous culture. The framework used in the article recognizes shared radicalized historical experiences and examines how a large segment of the Guatemala population fits into distinct spheres of social and cultural beliefs norms and practices.

Current Issues

Pope Francis hit the spot by indicating that humanity is the cause of global warming that has lead to the climatic changes experienced across the globe. In the address, he pointed out that rich countries are the primary contributors to global warming (Goodstein et al., 2015). These statements have some sense of truth in them. Rich countries (developed countries) are by far the largest greenhouse gas contributors because of the high level of industrialization and automation. The activities in the developed countries though regulated are consistently increasing the greenhouse gasses in the atmosphere. Moreover, in his speech he indicated that the people should develop concern for the vulnerable people across the globe (Taylor, 2015). Therefore, the decisions made by businesses and countries should be such that they do not affect others. Nonetheless, his speech was not unidirectional since developing and under developed countries are also crucial elements in global warming. Developing countries also have their share of industrialization as well as other unregulated activities that result in global warming.

In his speech, Pope Francis appreciates the significance of industrialization and advances in technology to the world and in his speech he indicated that the world should not retrogress rather creates measures that can ensure sustainability. The pope's concern primarily lies on the unscrupulous practices of countries and businesses that result in the emission of greenhouse gasses (Taylor, 2015). Limiting the focus on the activities of developed countries would be giving the developing countries leeway to do whatever they want. The fact that the pope mentioned developed countries particularly the rich does not justify the activities that result in the increasing rate of global warming. He stated that people should grow past the obstructionist attitude with feigned ignorance that activities are causing global warming do not affect others (Khan, 2015).

The pope did not fall short when he indicated that income inequality is one of the critical factors that affect the United States. There is a rising gap in the levels of income and wealth in the country. The pope addressed the Congress regarding income inequality. In his speech, he indicated that the Congress had legislative power to remediate the issue. Moreover, he indicates that the Congress’ greatest responsibility was to enable the country to grow through legislative power (Goodstein et al., 2015). The underlying issue is not the identification of the presence of income inequality rather the efforts made to remediate the issue. Despite the fact that there is a growing consensus of the situation, there is little agreement on how it affects average Americans. The Congress has not made an effort to analyze fully or recognize the problem as a high priority issue. His concern was America’s capitalism (Khan, 2015).

The pope did not target the wall streets rather focused on the structures that enable poverty in the country. The pope indicated that achieving an inclusive and sustainable economy was to create and distribute wealth (Khan, 2015). People in the country need to earn fairly similar incomes to bring about growth in the country. In his remarks, he identified everybody as their neighbor’s keeper. These comments indicate that everybody in the community has a role to play in the development of the United States. The pope’s remarks appreciate the fact that people are not happy with the distribution of income in the country and that a fraction of the public get to enjoy while the others work hard to sustain a living (Khan, 2015).

Reference

Lawrence, A. (2013). Business and society: Stakeholders, ethics, public policy. McGraw-Hill Education.

Carey Jr, D., & Torres, M. G. (2010). Precursors to femicide: Guatemalan women in a vortex of violence. Latin American research review, 45(3), 142-164.

Fink, L. (2003). The Maya of Morganton: Work and Community in the Nuevo New South. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

Goodstein, L., Yardley, J., Cave, D & Davenport, C. (2015). Inside Pope Francis’ Address to Congress.

Taylor, J., (2015). Why conservatives must fight climate change.

Khan, N., (2015). Pope Francis highlights climate change, immigration at White House.

Sherry Roberts is the author of this paper. A senior editor at MeldaResearch.Com in graduate paper writing service if you need a similar paper you can place your order from custom research paper writing service.

"Janet Peter is the Managing Director of a globally competitive essay writing company.