Directory Image
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using our website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

Technology Articles You Must Read Today

Author: Alldat Matterz
by Alldat Matterz
Posted: Jul 25, 2019

IBM announced last week that it had moved the cognitive computing system to the cloud to form the Watson Discovery Advisor, allowing researchers, academics and anyone else trying to take advantage of large data the ability to test programs and hypotheses at unprecedented speeds.

Because Watson is designed to understand nuances in natural language, this new service allows researchers to process millions of data points that humans can not normally process. This can reduce project deadlines from years to weeks or days.

The ability to understand natural language queries is a big problem. You can ask, for example: "I'll go to Boston, I love basketball, what do you suggest, Watson?" You can get several answers: Celtics Tickets, Boston College Tickets, and Harvard Tickets. Or during the holiday season, Watson may suggest that you go to the Basketball Hall of Fame in Springfield (Massachusetts). Latest technology news Companies are already using Watson this way. Watson-based retail solutions are offered by Fluid, Inc. "I take my wife and three children to the camp in New York State in October and I need a tent." Consider this: Watson was educated to pass medical advice. Do you trust me for your diagnosis and prescription? What happens if you say you have pain (for example, back pain, migraines, and depression), and Watson does not believe in your personal contribution? Here's more to think about: What would happen if Watson could learn the code? why not? It is not unusual to note that while Watson works with developers, one day he may create solutions based on a natural language query. This is equally exciting and disturbing. Now, if you want to make fun of Watson, read this article by Steve Lohr in The New York Times (2013) about Watson in the kitchen. Just take a look: the kicker is in the end.

Ed Lin, of BBC News, wrote a great article on how to change technology for disaster relief.

Consider the Royal Air Force's efforts to distribute the following to refugees in northern Iraq: water; food; and technology for communication: energy for mobile phones. Lin describes the initiative:

Along with tents and drinking water, the RAF aircraft fired more than 1,000 solar lamps connected to chargers for all types of mobile phones for individuals stranded in the Yezidi religious community below.

This is the first time lanterns have been thrown into the air in a relief effort, but aid workers say they are part of the growing effort to develop technology designed to make a difference in disaster areas.

Imagine a solar powered flashlight that could lead you to the camp using a secret wire for an energy source with connections to countless types of phones. Inability to communicate during crisis situations weakens, and becomes more within days (see below).

In a separate project, Dr. Paul Gardner of Australia created a "network" that allows people in emergency situations to communicate through their mobile device even if they do not have an Internet connection. Users can send text messages, make calls, send files to other nearby users, and create a mobile network over a network of users. Why is this so important in times of crisis such as war zones or earthquakes? Gardner says Stephen:

In general, you have almost three days to re-establish communication before the bad guys realize that good people are no longer in control.

Add briefly, and throw a glove:

There is a lot of technology for wealthy white men. It is the rest of the world that we need help with.

When we offer Solar Sunlite Lantern, Lin gives us a reminder not only of the wonders of technology used in developing countries, but also the need for more innovation and the distribution of technology and knowledge worldwide.

Roy Smith, a Forbes assistant, addresses the question above. It begins with a reference to Hannah Arendt and a reference to Stanley Milgram in support of her suggestion that we do not feel death. This is not new, Smythe explains that he is not interested in the problem here. Latest technology news What is interesting is Smith's natural argument that the distance between healthcare providers and patients has become so great that the provision of medical care at "a turning point in history separates the entire epoch," in Arendt's words.

The myriad techniques create the distance between the patient and the caregiver, all designed to make the treatment of patients more effective. Smythe reminds us of telemedicine platforms and other forms of "virtual visits" or personal care tools. Such care will be standard much faster than most want. Dr. Rocheka Fernandibol, Co-Founder and Executive Director of Iora Health, quotes the position that medical care is essentially human. Fernandabol wrote:

What cures people is relationships: the problem is that technology has the ability to facilitate relationships, but it can hinder them.

Above all, Smythe does not want telemedicine to lead physicians to be sensitive to death. Draw an interesting parallel: the use of drones in the war. Without shoes on the ground or live images directly on the battlefield, death can become abstract and disinfected. Mobility from an unmanned aircraft to a launch site is relatively easy, and we must all emphasize it relatively, in terms of seeing and feeling the consequences of the war. On the contrary, throwing a grenade on the wall, driving an explosive device, engaging in fierce fighting, and other critical military tasks can not bring anyone close to the enemy and the facts of death.

Leaving this analogy to the medical world may be difficult. But when we do, we find that "remote medicine" initially seems harmless compared, then very dangerous.

Rick Delgado of Smart Data Collective contributed information on potential Internet pitfalls.

I crossed my mind as I read this article. Latest technology news First, Delgado points to the obvious but equally important point: the ability to take advantage of Internet wealth requires something that we take for granted: access to the Internet. I will not talk about rural electrification. Many of them do not have an Internet connection, even in the developed world and the United States. It gets worse as ignorance grows. Salim writes:

While companies can talk passionately about Internet things, consumers do not know that. In a recent survey of 2,000 people, 87% of consumers said they had never heard of Internet things. While listening to Internet things does not necessarily mean that the consumer does not use a component connected to the internet things, the results of the survey show lack of knowledge and understanding of what can be obtained from it. If this lack of knowledge about Internet things leads to lack of interest, there will be an important driving force for adoption on a large scale.

In one of the worst technological predictions of all time, IBM President Thomas Watson announced in 1943: "I think there is a global market for perhaps five computers." Talk about the possibility of disruptive innovation in IBM. Watson was wrong and wrong, but he was barely stupid. Whether we believe it, Mr. Watson, I suggest, knew much more about his industry at that time than experts today know about the Internet of things, which is still in its infancy but growing rapidly. According to Gartner, there will be more than 25000 million sensors in the world by 2020. It is not surprising that 87% of consumers do not realize billions of sensors worldwide. What (would be surprising) would be surprising if we did not follow Google's steps to expand Internet connectivity around the world. This will be the tragedy of the commons with a bad touch. We do not run out of resources. On the contrary, it grows daily because we feed it. The lack of participation "alone" excludes a global high-tech race, which I will restrict here for the argument of non-military uses. Now this is a race we must all enter.

Tracy Wallace writes in the Umbel Code (Truth in Data) about cities based on data and Internet stuff.

Wallace describes how each city has become a treasure trove of data and the use of new technologies. Let's see some:

Latest technology news Convert old phone booths to Wi-Fi connection points (NYC);

All household waste is absorbed directly from individual kitchens through a wide underground underground network to waste treatment centers where they are sorted, removed and processed automatically. (Songdo, South Korea);

Wi-Fi communities provide access points that enhance city services such as water meters, leak sensors, parking meters and other city services to work on the same secure government network. (Dallas);

There are no lighting switches or water taps in the city; traffic sensors control lighting and water to reduce electricity and water consumption by 51 and 55%, respectively. (Source, United Arab Emirates).

These initiatives are incredible. Think about what a source does. It is like an automatic clap that provides energy ("clap on, clap off"). Consider your savings and what it means for energy consumption if such a program is implemented as far as possible around the world. wow. Surely there will be a company wrapped around this as we talk. What then?.. Which of you would be the first to sit on a bench on the edge of the garden and use the phone booth near the other side of the street as your hot spot? This is very beautiful

Richard Boer in the smart data set asks: The disappearance of the data world: heresy or reality? Williams CEO Sonoma certainly has an opinion.

Boire comments on an article for "the leader of information technology in a respected American organization" and did not give his name. Boire writes about this theme:

The author assumed that future data scientists would become switchboard operators: old. The main reason for this decrease in demand according to the author is that the increase in automation and operation of business processes will not require the technical skills of the data world.

Boire takes the opposite position:

With the analysis of large data and large data, the need for further analysis and personal solutions is growing exponentially. Methods and methods of analysis should be faster and more flexible, requiring IT support to achieve greater operational and automation. This does not replace the data world.

We can leave the automation debate mainly to the Quants. But I think they ignore the fact that data science is also a human endeavor by nature. Thomas Davenport says, for example, that both creativity and instinct are necessary to interpret the data. This is particularly true when the CEO's intuition shows lack of understanding of the data science. Writing in Quants: "The goal, therefore, is to make analytical decisions while maintaining the role of operational instinct." This Latest technology news instinct that has been tested in the battle can be necessary to evaluate the data management initiative. More relevant content: The September issue of the Harvard Business Review contains an article by Laura Albert, CEO of Williams Sonoma over the past four years. (Article is closed). It describes creativity at the Williams-Sonoma headquarters in San Francisco, as well as "data analysts who calculate, model and analyze reports." Continues:

If Williams-Sonoma has a "secret sauce", these teams work together in a great alliance to develop and implement our tactical strategy and priorities. In my nineteen years in the company and four executives, I found that the best solutions stem from the desire to combine art, science, ideas, data and instinct analysis.

About the Author

Latest news, latest Bollywood news, Sports news, Healths tips all the information are in one platform on can read about the trending news.

Rate this Article
Leave a Comment
Author Thumbnail
I Agree:
Author: Alldat Matterz

Alldat Matterz

Member since: Sep 14, 2018
Published articles: 5

Related Articles