Directory Image
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using our website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

The Future of Ammunition

Author: Steven J. Stanek
by Steven J. Stanek
Posted: Jul 04, 2016

You’d think of Q’s inventions as urban legends, specifically created to make James Bond movies seem larger than life, but many of those legends could turn out to be the future of ammunition. Just take a look at the Radically Invasive Projectile (RIP) bullet for inspiration.

The RIP bullet uses a standard metal jacket, but its nose has been split into trocars which open up and split into different directions upon impact, shredding anything that comes in their way into pieces. These frangible bullets have been marketed as the ‘last bullet you’ll ever need’ and the ‘premium self-defence round’, and rightly so.

The Dawn of a New Era

To truly understand the future of bullets and the projected role of frangible projectiles, you need to take a look at the latest trends in the world of ammunition. The RIP technology has been around for a while, but it’s only now that new concepts are coming up. Consider the MIB bullet for a moment. This isn’t a bullet that waits for impact to split up. It comes with a main core and three parts that are joined to the core using a string. So as the bullet leaves the barrel, the petals break off, moving into different directions, giving you a far wider zone of impact. Technology has dramatically helped in creating these bullets as experts resorted to the use of CAD software to build new prototypes.

The Good

The good thing about these frangible bullets is that you shoot to kill, pretty much like Bond himself. Often called the finger of god, these bullets are sure to kill anything that comes in their way. They are made from copper which allows them to retain their shape for a longer period of time, and the absence of lead saves you and the environment around you from the horrible dangers of lead poisoning. ‘They really changed the game’, says Phil Massaro, a pro hand-loader, and thousands others echo his sentiment. Recent developments also allowed for reforms that not only prevented fouling, a common issue with all-copper bullets, but also helped to improve shooting accuracy.

Frangible ammunition has often been accused of over-killing. However, if ammo is instantly lethal, it has a far better chance of killing gently and quickly. Yes, it expands and the shredding fragments cause havoc in their wake, but ultimately, the target suffers less and dies faster. This certainly sounds great when you’re talking about hunting. The animal suffers less and the environment doesn’t have to bear the cost of a lead-based projectile. However, it does pose an entirely different problem when considering human situations, because often, innocent bystanders get in the way.

The Not So Good

Despite their advantages, frangible projectiles are sure to come under criticism for the simple fact that they ‘look expensive’. The RIP bullet sells for $45 a box which contains 20 9mm bullets, while you can get 50 regular ones for just $20. However, when you compare the cost to the long-term damage caused by lead-based ammunition, it really does seem to be worth it, doesn’t it!

The future of bullets is rapidly changing and it’s incredibly difficult to predict the developments that may take place over the next decade. Experts predict to witness a greater demand for frangible ammunition as the world tries to move beyond lead, but the real action should start once manufacturers manage to combine the best of monolithic and frangible technology and weaponry starts catching up with the advancements seen in the field of ammunition.

About Author:

Steven J. Stanek usually writes articles and blogs related to industrial Mechanism and Products, In this article he writes about frangible projectiles and frangible bullets. He has been vehemently writing articles for Ecomass.com

About the Author

Steven J. Stanek usually writes articles and blogs related to industrial Mechanism and Products, In this article he writes about radiation shielding.

Rate this Article
Leave a Comment
Author Thumbnail
I Agree:
Comment 
Pictures
Author: Steven J. Stanek

Steven J. Stanek

Member since: May 16, 2014
Published articles: 220

Related Articles