Directory Image
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using our website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

What is peer-review of a manuscript? benefits of peer-reviewing a manuscript - Pubrica

Author: Pubrica UK
by Pubrica UK
Posted: Jan 14, 2021

Brief :

  • Peer review is the critical assessment of manuscripts submitted to journals by experts who are usually not part of the editorial staff.
  • The investigator’s final manuscript of a peer-reviewed article accepted for journal publication, including all modifications from the peer review process."

The manuscript should also include :

  • Figures, charts, tables and images
  • Supplemental materials associated with the work
  • Title page
  • Names and affiliations of the authors
  • The corresponding author’s name and email address
  • Grant award acknowledgements

Introduction:

Peer review can be described as a process in which a person reads, checks and gives his or her opinion on a piece of work written by another scientist or expert working in the same field. Generally speaking, two forms of peer review can be distinguished: ‘in-class peer review’ for undergraduate students and academic peer review’ for research scholars.

Peer review is a central aspect of academic study. In general, the scientific publication process consists of three main participants:

Authors were submitting a manuscript outlining their findings, editors determining whether the paper will be offered for peer review and eventually accepted for publication, and peer reviewers performing evaluations that will allow the editor to make a better-informed decision on suitability. These reviewers play an understated yet crucial role in the process, utilizing their capability to constructively critique a piece of work for the benefit of the broader scientific community.

Methodology:

To gain insight into the attitudes towards the participation of ecrs in peer review, we have distributed a survey to academics in ten countries across the globe. The survey covered numerous aspects of the peer review process, including how many peer-review invites are commonly accepted by academics, if they included ecrs (postgraduate researchers only in their evaluations, and if so, what was their motivation to involve ecrs. We requested that academics determine the effect of peer review on the essential skills of their students based on their previous experience. Besides, a separate survey was distributed to the ecrs (student survey) to assess their attitudes towards peer review participation.

Benefits of peer-reviewing a manuscript:

Corrects vague terms:

While i use an online thesaurus every time i write to find the right word to describe a concept, in some cases, some words seem to be incorrect or vague. Having input from peers lets me determine whether i have to adhere to my terms or consider what they say. I do not hesitate to alter the words in question if the idea sounds fine.

Provides feedback as to the effectiveness of your communication:

Oh, it is. If grasped the points you advanced in your manuscript, you can readily see from the reactions of your peer group. Suppose that after a page has been displayed to provide their input, it takes them a little longer than expected, which will possibly mean that something is wrong with the flow of thinking or conversation. Questions for clarity will most likely come next. And yes, they have.

Prevents you from committing serious blunders in your arguments:

You may have made points that may be based on incorrect assumptions. Once the beliefs are false, then everything you’ve published is wrong. This result observes the laws of logic. If the premises are defective, so it is unreliable with anything that goes beyond it.

Facilitates concise writing:

More than what is required, you might have written. The elimination here and there of needless paragraphs or phrases gives rise to a short, adequately written manuscript.

Encourages you to perform better next time:

The next time you are on the watch for the possible comments, suggestions, or criticism of your book, if the peer review exercise has shown you any positive feedback. When you add all the terms and recommendations of colleagues, you will then compose better than ever. Thus in your previous article, you stop making the same errors. There are tremendous advantages to peer-review.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, the method of peer-review is collegial at its best, not adversarial. Finally, when guided by attentive, detailed, insightful reviews, and they have the privilege of seeing papers and journal reputations improve as part of the process, editors gain trust in their decisions to accept an article.

Reference : https://pubrica.com/services/publication-support/peer-review-pre-submission/

Continue Reading : http://bit.ly/3bg2YwA

Why Pubrica?

When you order our services, Plagiarism free|onTime|outstanding customer support|Unlimited Revisions support|High-quality Subject Matter Experts.

Contact us :

Web: https://pubrica.com/

Blog: https://pubrica.com/academy/

Email: sales@pubrica.com

WhatsApp : +91 9884350006

United Kingdom: +44- 74248 10299

About the Author

Pubrica’s services span all phases of scientific and academic writing, editing, and publishing. We have experts across all subjects and specializations. Talk to us today.

Rate this Article
Leave a Comment
Author Thumbnail
I Agree:
Comment 
Pictures
Author: Pubrica UK

Pubrica UK

Member since: Jul 29, 2019
Published articles: 96

Related Articles